Convert Rails 3 associations post to Markdown.

2 files changed, 43 insertions, 31 deletions

diff --git a/_posts/2011-12-09-same-class-associations-in-rails-3.html b/_posts/2011-12-09-same-class-associations-in-rails-3.html
deleted file mode 100644
index 654f69d..0000000
--- a/_posts/2011-12-09-same-class-associations-in-rails-3.html
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
----
-layout: post
-title: Same class associations in Rails 3
-tags:
-- Development
-status: publish
-type: post
-published: true
-meta:
-  _edit_last: '1'
-  _cws_is_markdown: '1'
----
-<strong>[TL;DR]</strong> Even though the selected events conceptually belong to a record, the latter has the foreign keys to former. So technically, <code>has_one</code> is to be changed to <code>belongs_to</code>.
-
-<hr />
-
-This is the first time I've ran into something like this and it was interesting to realize what it actually means when developing a business logic in Rails.
-
-<h3>Context</h3>
-
-In this app I'm building, I have <em>Students</em> that have a <em>Record</em> per year. Each record has several <em>Events</em>. These records also have two specific events: a <em>test</em> and an <em>audition</em>, registered in the schema as <code>id</code>'s in the record's table.
-
-<h3>So what did technically happen?</h3>
-
-I wasn't able to access those specific events through the associations specified in the model. Given <code>r = Record.first</code>, when I tried to access the audition, by using <code>r.test</code>, Rails would use a SQL query that would correspond to <code>r.events.first</code> instead.
-
-After acknowledging that, I turned to <a href="http://twitter.com/varandas">@varandas</a> and we both thought it might be a bug in the Rails framework. Turns out it wasn't; all I had to do was switch from <code>has_one</code> to <code>belongs_to</code> (thanks <a href="http://github.com/drogus">@drogus</a>!). The reason for that is the foreign key is on the <code>records</code> table. From the framework's perspective, it looks like the record actually <em>belongs to</em> the event, when in practice it's not.
-
-<h3>Code sample</h3>
-
-[gist id=1449428]
diff --git a/_posts/2011-12-09-same-class-associations-in-rails-3.markdown b/_posts/2011-12-09-same-class-associations-in-rails-3.markdown
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e7062e4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/_posts/2011-12-09-same-class-associations-in-rails-3.markdown
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: Same class associations in Rails 3
+tags: development
+type: post
+published: true
+---
+
+**[TL;DR]** Even though the selected events conceptually belong to a record,
+the latter has the foreign keys to former. So technically, `has_one`
+is to be changed to `belongs_to`.
+
+* * *
+
+This is the first time I've ran into something like this and it was interesting
+to realize what it actually means when developing a business logic in Rails.
+
+### Context
+
+In this app I'm building, I have <em>Students</em> that have a <em>Record</em>
+per year. Each record has several <em>Events</em>. These records also have two
+specific events: a <em>test</em> and an <em>audition</em>, registered in the
+schema as `id`'s in the record's table.
+
+### So what did technically happen?
+
+I wasn't able to access those specific events through the associations
+specified in the model. Given <code>r = Record.first</code>, when I tried to
+access the audition, by using <code>r.test</code>, Rails would use a SQL query
+that would correspond to <code>r.events.first</code> instead.
+
+After acknowledging that, I turned to <a
+href="http://twitter.com/varandas">@varandas</a> and we both thought it might
+be a bug in the Rails framework. Turns out it wasn't; all I had to do was
+switch from <code>has\_one</code> to <code>belongs\_to</code> (thanks <a
+  href="http://github.com/drogus">@drogus</a>!). The reason for that is the
+  foreign key is on the <code>records</code> table. From the framework's
+  perspective, it looks like the record actually <em>belongs to</em> the event,
+  when in practice it's not.
+
+### Code sample
+
+<script src="http://gist.github.com/1449428.js"></script>