summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/_posts/2008-10-20-corrupt-kings-an-approach-to-greedy-people-of-the-web.markdown
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJosé Mota <josemota.net@gmail.com>2012-04-08 20:32:15 +0100
committerJosé Mota <josemota.net@gmail.com>2012-04-08 20:32:15 +0100
commitc9acd467e38fa267db5972de02a3615ff6998355 (patch)
tree8959cf7099de692f33a48bfebe022c5de67e03c5 /_posts/2008-10-20-corrupt-kings-an-approach-to-greedy-people-of-the-web.markdown
parent6ce6a1f1f45889acf68ad2fd0ee5a5a39d8ca9ba (diff)
Update some more posts.
Diffstat (limited to '_posts/2008-10-20-corrupt-kings-an-approach-to-greedy-people-of-the-web.markdown')
-rw-r--r--_posts/2008-10-20-corrupt-kings-an-approach-to-greedy-people-of-the-web.markdown31
1 files changed, 31 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/_posts/2008-10-20-corrupt-kings-an-approach-to-greedy-people-of-the-web.markdown b/_posts/2008-10-20-corrupt-kings-an-approach-to-greedy-people-of-the-web.markdown
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f331abd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/_posts/2008-10-20-corrupt-kings-an-approach-to-greedy-people-of-the-web.markdown
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: ! "Corrupt kings: an approach to greedy people of the web"
+tags: [ design, loadacrap ]
+published: true
+---
+
+This is something that intrigues me pretty much: design companies / people who
+claim themselves the trophy for great products and yet they suck. I tag these
+guys as _corrupt kings _or _napoleons_ of the web because they think they are
+the best at what they do and yet they don't and no one tells them so!
+
+I met a client a couple days ago. He asked me to retake on a project that used
+a very strange platform. "Please take a look at the current launch, José". What
+do I do? I browse CSS, accessibility, usability and source code. The apparently
+awarded CMS was built on a table based layout and it didn't show the same
+results over different browsers. And you say: "OK, so what's the problem with
+designing on top of a table layout ?" If it works on many browsers and you
+can't afford web standards, well... keep it! But if it comes out as a complete
+junk like this, I would be ashamed of myself. The website looks like this in
+[Internet Explorer](http://localhost:8888/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/ie6.png),
+[Firefox](http://localhost:8888/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/firefox.png) and
+[Safari](http://localhost:8888/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/safari.png).
+
+Any _napoleon_ with this level of costumer fidelity - yea, the costumers
+say they have _really great_ products! my gosh... — ought to be better
+prepared to face the real challenge, when users start to realize there are many
+browsers to choose from, new technologies improve user experience and designers
+and developers create the web differently with more care for performance,
+beauty and usability. Are you a designer reading this? Take a look at web
+standards and cross-browser experience. I'm sure you'll like it.